Raimundo v. Fairchester Bakers, Inc.
265 A.D. 861
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 1942·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The jury may not, however, infer that such witness would, if called, testify unfavorably to the party who failed to call him. (Perlman v. Shanck, 192 App. Div. 179, 183, 184; Murthey v. Murthey, 261 App. Div. 991; affd., 287 N. Y. 740.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raimundo v. Fairchester Bakers, Inc., 265 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 861 (Raimundo v. Fairchester Bakers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gill v. Anderson
39 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Zausmer v. Suozzi
23 Misc. 2d 783 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Mintz v. Wipper
207 Misc. 780 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Orsolits v. H. Hyman Drum & Barrel Corp.
283 A.D. 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Flamm v. Noble
274 A.D. 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)