Railway v. Dick

52 Ark. 402
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Negligence. The company having permitted cotton-seed to accumulate on or about its track, was under obligation to maintain reasonable care to prevent injury to stock attracted thereby. Jones v. Nichols, 46 Ark., 207; Ry. v. Kirksey, 48 Ark., 366; Crafton v. Ry., 55 Mo., 580; Page v. Ry., 71 N. C., 222.

The burden was upon the company to overcome the prima facie case of negligence made by the killing, by showing that its servants had used the degree of care indicated by the charge, to avert the injury. The proof does not show that state of case, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Railway v. Dick, 52 Ark. 402 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 402 (Railway v. Dick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clapper v. Pennsylvania Railroad
6 Pa. D. & C. 619 (Blair County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)