Railway v. Barger

52 Ark. 78
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Evidence: Declarations of agent. The admission of the statement made by Frost was error. The only object of the testimony was to prove unreasonable delay upon the part of the company in repairing the platform, after the defect in it became known. The statement of the agent was incompetent for that purpose.

Story on Agency, sec. 136; R. R. v. Fillmore, 57 Ill., 265; R. R. v. Riddle, 60 Ill., 534; Flynn v. State, 43 Ark., 289.

Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Railway v. Barger, 52 Ark. 78 (Ark. 1889).

52 Ark. 78 (Railway v. Barger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Railway Co. v. Sweet
21 S.W. 587 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1893)