Railway Labor Executives' Association v. City of Galveston, Texas, Acting by and Through the Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves

Fifth Circuit

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. City of Galveston, Texas, Acting by and Through the Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves

898 F.2d 481, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5773, 1990 WL 36224

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1990

Docket90-2070

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 898 F.2d 481 (Railway Labor Executives' Association v. City of Galveston, Texas, Acting by and Through the Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. City of Galveston, Texas, Acting by and Through the Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves, 898 F.2d 481, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5773, 1990 WL 36224 (5th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

Because the pendency of the interlocutory appeal from the district court’s judgment denying the preliminary injunction did not divest the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with other aspects of the case, 1 that court did not act improperly in considering the plaintiff’s petition for a permanent injunction. For the reasons given in Railway Labor Executives’ Association v. City of Galveston, 897 F.2d 164 (5th *482 Cir.1990), we affirm the district courts judgment denying that petition.

1

. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c); Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. United States, 416 F.2d 952, 954 (5th Cir.1969); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2962, at 631-32 (1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

Because the pendency of the interlocutory appeal from the district court’s judgment denying the preliminary injunction did not divest the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with other aspects of the case, 1 that court did not act improperly in considering the plaintiff’s petition for a permanent injunction. For the reasons given in Railway Labor Executives’ Association v. City of Galveston, 897 F.2d 164 (5th *482 Cir.1990), we affirm the district courts judgment denying that petition.

1

. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c); Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. United States, 416 F.2d 952, 954 (5th Cir.1969); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2962, at 631-32 (1973).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

898 F.2d 481, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2088, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 5773, 1990 WL 36224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railway-labor-executives-association-v-city-of-galveston-texas-acting-ca5-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack