Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
38 F.3d 1224, 309 U.S. App. D.C. 36, 1994 WL 665312
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 20, 1994·No. Nos. 91-5223, 91-5310·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
ORDER
It is ORDERED by the Court that the opinion of July 19, 1994 in the above entitled case is amended as follows:
On page 658, “Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Williams” should be amended to read:
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Williams, with whom Circuit Judges Silber-man, Ginsburg and Henderson join.
On page 673 of Judge Williams’ dissent, the first line should be amended to read:
Williams, Circuit Judge, dissenting, • in which Silberman, Ginsburg and Henderson, Circuit Judges join:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board, 38 F.3d 1224, 309 U.S. App. D.C. 36, 1994 WL 665312 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
38 F.3d 1224 (Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Home Care Association of America v. Weil
76 F. Supp. 3d 138 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Depomed, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
66 F. Supp. 3d 217 (District of Columbia, 2014)
National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n AFL-CIO v. Federal Service Impasses Panel
437 F.3d 1256 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
Fag Italia S.p.A. v. United States
291 F.3d 806 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
James May v. Shuttle, Inc.
129 F.3d 165 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)
Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employes
928 F. Supp. 7 (District of Columbia, 1996)
United Ass'n of Journeymen v. Reno
73 F.3d 1134 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)