Home/U.S. Customs Court/Railway Express Agency v. United States

Railway Express Agency v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Railway Express Agency v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 452 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 12, 1956·No. No. 60036; protests 171363-K, etc. (Pembina)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of Swift & Company et al. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Railway Express Agency v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 479 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 479 (Railway Express Agency v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swift & Co. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)