Railway Co. v. Mayes

24 S.W. 1076, 58 Ark. 397, 1894 Ark. LEXIS 108
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 27, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 S.W. 1076 (Railway Co. v. Mayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Railway Co. v. Mayes, 24 S.W. 1076, 58 Ark. 397, 1894 Ark. LEXIS 108 (Ark. 1894).

Opinion

Wood J.,

(after stating the facts). It is not negligence “per se ” to jump from a moving train. But where one, compos mentis, under no circumstances of emergency or constraint, takes “a leap in the dark” from a train moving at the rate shown in this case, his conduct is reckless and foolhardy. St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Rosenberry, 45 Ark. 256 ; Catlett v. Railway Company, 57 Ark. 461.

The learned circuit judge, upon appellee’s own statement and the undisputed facts, might very properly have directed a verdict for appellant.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Mallott
6 S.W.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.W. 1076, 58 Ark. 397, 1894 Ark. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railway-co-v-mayes-ark-1894.