Railway Clerks v. United Air Lines, Inc.
This text of 379 U.S. 26 (Railway Clerks v. United Air Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS & STATION EMPLOYEES
v.
UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
Supreme Court of United States.
James L. Highsaw, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Edward J. Hickey, Jr.
Stuart Bernstein argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were H. Templeton Brown and Robert L. Stern.
Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, believing that the questions which brought this case here should be decided, dissents from the dismissal of the writ.
MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
379 U.S. 26, 85 S. Ct. 183, 13 L. Ed. 2d 173, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railway-clerks-v-united-air-lines-inc-scotus-1965.