Railway Advertising Co. v. Posner

31 Misc. 783, 65 N.Y.S. 226
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

In this case the justice found that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $377, but gave judgment for the defendants, with costs. This conclusion was evidently reached upon the theory that there had been a sufficient tender of the amount due before suit, but the defendants, to avail themselves of this defense should have pleaded the tender, and kept the tender good by paying the same into court. Becker v. Boon, 61 N. Y. 317. They did-neither, and the judgment was, therefore, improper. Without considering the other errors assigned, the judgment should be reversed.

Present: Beekmae, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appel-

lant to abide event

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Railway Advertising Co. v. Posner, 31 Misc. 783, 65 N.Y.S. 226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

31 Misc. 783 (Railway Advertising Co. v. Posner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rush v. Wagner
184 A.D. 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)