Railroad v. Bailey

143 N.C. 380
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 18, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 143 N.C. 380 (Railroad v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Railroad v. Bailey, 143 N.C. 380 (N.C. 1906).

Opinion

BkowN, J.

We think bis Honor ruled correctly in dismissing tbe appeal as premature and properly remanded tbe cause to tbe Clerk to be proceeded with under tbe order appointing commissioners, which bad been made by tbe Clerk in pursuance of tbe statute, Nevisal, sec. 2580. In tbe case of Railroad v. Newton, 133 N. C., 132, it is decided that an order of tbe Superior Court in. condemnation proceedings, remanding tbe cause to tbe Clerk that be may bear tbe same, is interlocutory and no appeal lies therefrom to tbe Supreme Court, though a plea in bar was filed by tbe defendant. That no appeal can be taken at such stage in condemnation proceed[381]*381ings, viz., when the Judge below remands the cause to the Clerk, has been repeatedly adjudged before the case of Railroad v. Newton. Telegraph Co. v. Railroad, 83 N. C., 420; Railroad v. Railroad, 83 N. C., 499; Railroad v. Warren, 92 N. C., 622.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holly Shelter Railroad v. Newton
45 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Norfolk Southern Railroad v. . Warren
92 N.C. 620 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
American Union Telegraph Co. v. Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta Railroad
83 N.C. 420 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.C. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railroad-v-bailey-nc-1906.