Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Zelkind
This text of 247 A.D. 110 (Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Zelkind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An action to foreclose a mortgage on real property must be tried in the county wherein the property is situated, and there is no authority for the appointment of a receiver in any other county. (Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Roerich Museum, 236 App. Div. 76; appeal dismissed, 260 N. Y. 562; Civ. Prac. Act, § 183, subd. 4.)
[111]*111The order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the order appointing the receiver should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the receivership order should be granted, with ten dollars costs.
Present — McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 110, 286 N.Y.S. 158, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railroad-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-zelkind-nyappdiv-1936.