Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rosemont Holding Corp.

248 A.D. 909, 290 N.Y.S. 609, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8039
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate a final judgment of foreclosure [910]*910and sale affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court of the State of New York is a court of general jurisdiction (State Const, art. 6, § 1), and its jurisdiction in law and equity extends to the whole State. Section 183 of the Civil Practice Act does not affect the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, but determines only the county of trial. (Cragin v. Lovell, 88 N. Y. 258, 263.) If the defendant does not avail himself of the provisions of the Civil Practice Act to have the cause moved to the proper county for trial, a judgment in an action affecting real property brought in a county other than that designated as the proper county is valid. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rosemont Holding Corp., 248 A.D. 909, 290 N.Y.S. 609, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 909 (Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rosemont Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wager v. Pelham Union Free School District
108 A.D.3d 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Brunner v. Steinhardt
4 Misc. 2d 923 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)