Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rosemont Holding Corp.
This text of 248 A.D. 909 (Railroad Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rosemont Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate a final judgment of foreclosure [910]*910and sale affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court of the State of New York is a court of general jurisdiction (State Const, art. 6, § 1), and its jurisdiction in law and equity extends to the whole State. Section 183 of the Civil Practice Act does not affect the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, but determines only the county of trial. (Cragin v. Lovell, 88 N. Y. 258, 263.) If the defendant does not avail himself of the provisions of the Civil Practice Act to have the cause moved to the proper county for trial, a judgment in an action affecting real property brought in a county other than that designated as the proper county is valid. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 909, 290 N.Y.S. 609, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railroad-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-rosemont-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1936.