Railroad Companies v. Chamberlain

73 U.S. 748, 18 L. Ed. 859, 6 Wall. 748, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 1021
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 16, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 73 U.S. 748 (Railroad Companies v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Railroad Companies v. Chamberlain, 73 U.S. 748, 18 L. Ed. 859, 6 Wall. 748, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 1021 (1868).

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the .court

We think that the court erred in dismissing the cross-bill. It was filed for the purpose of enforcing the judgment, which was in the Circuit Court, and could be tiled in no other court, and was but ancillary to and dependent upon the original suit — an appropriate proceeding for the purpose of obtaining satisfaction. The lease was in the nature of a mortgage, and held only as collateral security, and followed the judgment. *

The decree in the first suit must be affirmed, and that in the second reversed, and the cause remitted to the court be-: low to enter a decree

In conformity with this opinion.

*

Freeman v. Howe et al., 24 Howard, 451.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaumagraph Co. v. General Trade Mark Corporation
12 F. Supp. 230 (S.D. New York, 1935)
Dickey v. Turner
49 F.2d 998 (Sixth Circuit, 1931)
Mathis v. Ligon
39 F.2d 455 (Tenth Circuit, 1930)
Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange
296 F. 61 (Second Circuit, 1923)
Lincoln National Bank v. John Peirce Co.
127 N.E. 253 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Brown v. Crawford
252 F. 248 (D. Oregon, 1918)
Ferguson v. Omaha & S. W. R.
227 F. 513 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Ulman v. Iaeger's Adm'r
155 F. 1011 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia, 1907)
Ames Realty Co. v. Big Indian Mining Co.
146 F. 166 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana, 1906)
Coltrane v. Templeton
106 F. 370 (Fourth Circuit, 1901)
Haberman v. Kaufer
47 A. 48 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1900)
Gravenberg v. Laws
100 F. 1 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)
Brooks v. Laurent
98 F. 647 (Fifth Circuit, 1899)
Cœur D'Alene Ry. & Nav. Co. v. Spalding
93 F. 280 (Ninth Circuit, 1899)
Shainwald v. Lewis
69 F. 487 (N.D. California, 1895)
Compton v. Jesup
68 F. 263 (Sixth Circuit, 1895)
Ralston v. Sharon
51 F. 702 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1892)
Johnson v. Christian
125 U.S. 642 (Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 U.S. 748, 18 L. Ed. 859, 6 Wall. 748, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railroad-companies-v-chamberlain-scotus-1868.