Railroad Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
245 U.S. 638, 62 L. Ed. 525, 38 S. Ct. 191, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1647
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. InterState Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726; Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 245 U. S. 162.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Railroad Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 245 U.S. 638, 62 L. Ed. 525, 38 S. Ct. 191, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1647 (1918).
245 U.S. 638 (Railroad Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williamson v. Alldridge
320 F. Supp. 840 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1970)
Fermin Fonseca Flores v. Robert R. Prann, Jaime Fardonk Vazquez v. Porto Rico Lighterage Co., Roberto Galindo Ramos v. San Juan Dredging Corporation
282 F.2d 153 (First Circuit, 1960)
Porto Rico Brokerage Co. v. United States
76 F.2d 605 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1935)
Shepard v. United States
64 F.2d 641 (Tenth Circuit, 1933)
Bell v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
155 S.E. 397 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Driggers v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
148 S.E. 889 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
Lastra v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co.
2 F.2d 812 (First Circuit, 1924)