Raiford v. State
784 S.W.2d 827, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1990 WL 9625
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Larry Raiford, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing because it was filed in an untimely manner. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raiford v. State, 784 S.W.2d 827, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1990 WL 9625 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
784 S.W.2d 827 (Raiford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.