Raidle Cook Insurance, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co.
437 So. 2d 184, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23486
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 1983·No. No. 82-1721·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reversed and remanded for a new trial on all issues. Upon review of the record we believe it was error for the trial court to recall the jury after discharge and conduct further proceedings to determine the jury’s intent. Cf. Fitzell v. Rama Industries, Inc., 416 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Upon remand the parties should be given an opportunity to amend their pleadings to clarify the issues involved before a new trial is conducted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raidle Cook Insurance, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co., 437 So. 2d 184, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23486 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
437 So. 2d 184 (Raidle Cook Insurance, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cedars of Lebanon Hosp. v. Silva
476 So. 2d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)