Raichle, Moore, Banning & Weiss v. Commonwealth Financial Corp.
15 A.D.2d 632, 222 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Raichle, Moore, Banning & Weiss v. Commonwealth Financial Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 A.D.2d 830 →
Opinion
During the argument of the appeal the attorney for the defendant-appellant stated in plain and concise language that on behalf of his client he conceded that the plaintiffs-respondents had rendered some services for which they were entitled to be paid reasonable compensation out of the fund upon which the lien has attached. In view of this, we deem it appropriate to grant the motion to resettle our order. Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raichle, Moore, Banning & Weiss v. Commonwealth Financial Corp., 15 A.D.2d 632, 222 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
15 A.D.2d 632 (Raichle, Moore, Banning & Weiss v. Commonwealth Financial Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.