Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Raia v. Raia

Raia v. Raia

866 So. 2d 198, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1964, 2004 WL 329343
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 2004
DocketNos. 1D03-1282, 1D03-2026
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 866 So. 2d 198 (Raia v. Raia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raia v. Raia, 866 So. 2d 198, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1964, 2004 WL 329343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s Final Order on appeal. On cross-appeal, however, we reverse in part the Final Judgment rendered May 6, 2003, and remand to the trial court to award statutory interest on Former Husband’s attorney’s fee obligation of $14,264.00 to accrue from March 7, 2003. See Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. McBro, 619 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The remaining issue on cross-appeal is without merit.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forbes v. Crosby
866 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 198, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1964, 2004 WL 329343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raia-v-raia-fladistctapp-2004.