Raia v. Raia
866 So. 2d 198, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1964, 2004 WL 329343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 24, 2004·No. Nos. 1D03-1282, 1D03-2026·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s Final Order on appeal. On cross-appeal, however, we reverse in part the Final Judgment rendered May 6, 2003, and remand to the trial court to award statutory interest on Former Husband’s attorney’s fee obligation of $14,264.00 to accrue from March 7, 2003. See Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. McBro, 619 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The remaining issue on cross-appeal is without merit.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raia v. Raia, 866 So. 2d 198, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1964, 2004 WL 329343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 198 (Raia v. Raia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Forbes v. Crosby
866 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)