Raia v. Pototschnig

2017 NY Slip Op 1642, 148 A.D.3d 429, 47 N.Y.S.3d 711
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2017
Docket3322N 113006/09
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1642 (Raia v. Pototschnig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raia v. Pototschnig, 2017 NY Slip Op 1642, 148 A.D.3d 429, 47 N.Y.S.3d 711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme *430 Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered January 5, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant Hubert Po-totschnig to reject the report of the referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion, rejecting his attempts to relitigate issues already adjudicated in this action (see Domingez v Zinnar, 130 AD3d 414 [1st Dept 2015]). Defendant also failed to offer a proposed calculation of interest in response to the court’s several requests for him to do so, and the court otherwise afforded defendant ample opportunities to be heard on his objections to the referee’s report.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Fein-man, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Domingez v. Zinnar
130 A.D.3d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 1642, 148 A.D.3d 429, 47 N.Y.S.3d 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raia-v-pototschnig-nyappdiv-2017.