Raia v. Goldberg

34 So. 2d 625, 250 Ala. 398, 1948 Ala. LEXIS 574
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 25, 1948
Docket6 Div. 708.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 34 So. 2d 625 (Raia v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raia v. Goldberg, 34 So. 2d 625, 250 Ala. 398, 1948 Ala. LEXIS 574 (Ala. 1948).

Opinion

*399 BROWN, Justice.

The only points presented for review •relate to the sufficiency of the complaint against the defendant’s demurrer and the right of the plaintiff to recover interest on the alleged unpaid installments. The question of the effect of the defendant’s discharge in bankruptcy wherein the plaintiff was listed as a creditor is not presented and, as to that, we express no opinion.

As to the other questions, we are of opinion that, they are properly disposed of by the Court of Appeals and that the writ of certiorari is due to be denied and the ■petition therefor dismissed.

Certiorari denied and petition dismissed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LIVINGSTON .and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Haymes
49 Misc. 2d 939 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1966)
Selma Compress Company v. Parker
91 So. 2d 240 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1956)
Strange v. Miller
63 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1953)
Dick v. Dick
78 A.2d 580 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 So. 2d 625, 250 Ala. 398, 1948 Ala. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raia-v-goldberg-ala-1948.