Raia v. Goldberg
This text of 34 So. 2d 625 (Raia v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only points presented for review •relate to the sufficiency of the complaint against the defendant’s demurrer and the right of the plaintiff to recover interest on the alleged unpaid installments. The question of the effect of the defendant’s discharge in bankruptcy wherein the plaintiff was listed as a creditor is not presented and, as to that, we express no opinion.
As to the other questions, we are of opinion that, they are properly disposed of by the Court of Appeals and that the writ of certiorari is due to be denied and the ■petition therefor dismissed.
Certiorari denied and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 So. 2d 625, 250 Ala. 398, 1948 Ala. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raia-v-goldberg-ala-1948.