Rahn v. State Ex Rel. Weir

196 So. 807, 143 Fla. 376
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 14, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 807 (Rahn v. State Ex Rel. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rahn v. State Ex Rel. Weir, 196 So. 807, 143 Fla. 376 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by lhe Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 807, 143 Fla. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahn-v-state-ex-rel-weir-fla-1940.