Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rahming v. State

Rahming v. State

272 So. 2d 830
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1973
DocketNo. 72-786
StatusPublished

This text of 272 So. 2d 830 (Rahming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rahming v. State, 272 So. 2d 830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Rule 3.8501, 33 F.S.A. petition was denied without an evidentiary hearing. From the appellate presentation it appears to be conceded and without dispute that this was error. Pitts v. State, Fla.1971, 247 So.2d 53. Accordingly, the appealed order should be reversed and the cause remanded with respectful instructions to appoint new counsel for appellant (other than the Public Defender of Palm Beach County) and to afford appellant an evidentiary hearing upon the merits of his petition.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

REED, C. J„ and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitts v. State
247 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 So. 2d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahming-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.