Rahming v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Rahming v. State

592 So. 2d 678, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 94, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 18593

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 6, 1992·No. No. 78164·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

We review Rahming v. State, 579 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it relied on Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quashed, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991). The question presented in the instant case is whether Florida’s uniform sentencing guidelines allow legal constraint points to be assessed for each offense committed while under legal constraint. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash Rahm-ing and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald, judge.

We review Rahming v. State, 579 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it relied on Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quashed, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991). The question presented in the instant case is whether Florida’s uniform sentencing guidelines allow legal constraint points to be assessed for each offense committed while under legal constraint. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash Rahm-ing and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Rahming v. State, 592 So. 2d 678, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 94, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 18593 (Fla. 1992).

Pincite

592 So. 2d 678 (Rahming v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related