Rahming v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Rahming v. State

592 So. 2d 678, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 94, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 18593

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1992

DocketNo. 78164

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 592 So. 2d 678 (Rahming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rahming v. State, 592 So. 2d 678, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 94, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 18593 (Fla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

McDonald, judge.

We review Rahming v. State, 579 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it relied on Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quashed, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991). The question presented in the instant case is whether Florida’s uniform sentencing guidelines allow legal constraint points to be assessed for each offense committed while under legal constraint. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash Rahm-ing and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald, judge.

We review Rahming v. State, 579 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it relied on Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quashed, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991). The question presented in the instant case is whether Florida’s uniform sentencing guidelines allow legal constraint points to be assessed for each offense committed while under legal constraint. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash Rahm-ing and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 678, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 94, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 18593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahming-v-state-fla-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack