Rahmi v. Sovereign Bank
This text of 564 F. App'x 19 (Rahmi v. Sovereign Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Alex Rahmi appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for appointment of counsel and for a hearing on the order to show cause issued by the district court following the denial of Rahmi’s third motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rahmi v. Sovereign Bank, No. 3:12-cv-00087-GMG-DJJ (NJDW.Va. July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 F. App'x 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahmi-v-sovereign-bank-ca4-2014.