Rahmanan v. Smith
This text of 186 A.D.2d 363 (Rahmanan v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered July 22, 1991, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment was appropriately denied in this case concerning property damage allegedly caused by water bursting out of a pipe, because questions of fact exist, including whether the "drip” in the pipe, known to defendant prior to the letting to plaintiff, was a "defect”, and if so, whether it was a latent defect. Indeed, defendants concede that when [364]*364they leased the premises to plaintiffs, they owed a duty to disclose all known latent defects. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A.D.2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahmanan-v-smith-nyappdiv-1992.