Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This text of 2 N.E.3d 266 (Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Procedendo and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss of respondents. Motions granted. On relator’s motion for leave to file amended complaint, request for admissions (pleadings), alternatively, motion for granting an order for pleadings, motion for alternative writs, and judicial notice of adjudicative fact; alternatively, motion for court hearing for findings of fact on trespass, fraudulent documentations, and discrimination issues in this case, it is ordered that the motions and request are denied. Cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.E.3d 266, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahman-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-ohio-2014.