Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Ohio Supreme Court

Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

2 N.E.3d 266, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1470

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 2014·No. 2013-1700·Published

Opinion

In Procedendo and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss of respondents. Motions granted. On relator’s motion for leave to file amended complaint, request for admissions (pleadings), alternatively, motion for granting an order for pleadings, motion for alternative writs, and judicial notice of adjudicative fact; alternatively, motion for court hearing for findings of fact on trespass, fraudulent documentations, and discrimination issues in this case, it is ordered that the motions and request are denied. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Procedendo and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss of respondents. Motions granted. On relator’s motion for leave to file amended complaint, request for admissions (pleadings), alternatively, motion for granting an order for pleadings, motion for alternative writs, and judicial notice of adjudicative fact; alternatively, motion for court hearing for findings of fact on trespass, fraudulent documentations, and discrimination issues in this case, it is ordered that the motions and request are denied. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2 N.E.3d 266, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

2 N.E.3d 266 (Rahman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.