Rahman v. United States

119 F. Supp. 406, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4396
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided March 9, 1954·No. Civ. 13897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The Government moves to dismiss the complaint herein on the ground, that the action was prematurely brought since there has been no final disposition of the claim filed by the plaintiff with the Post Office Department, the Federal Agency involved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2675 (a).

The plaintiff has attached to the answering affidavit a letter, written on the stationery of the United States Post Of.fice, New York, addressed to him dated July 29,1953, and signed by Harold Riegelman, acting postmaster. This letter identifies the accident referred to in the complaint, in effect denies liability, places the responsibility on the plaintiff and demands payment of the sum of $112.64 to cover damage sustained by the mail truck.

In my opinion this is an unequivocal rejection of his claim. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Submit order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rahman v. United States, 119 F. Supp. 406, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4396 (E.D.N.Y. 1954).

119 F. Supp. 406 (Rahman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mildred Jerves v. United States
966 F.2d 517 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Whealton v. United States
271 F. Supp. 770 (E.D. Virginia, 1967)