Rahman v. Stouffer

Fourth Circuit

Rahman v. Stouffer

538 F. App'x 284

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2013·No. No. 13-6627·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raheem Rahman appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rahman v. Stouffer, No. 1:11-cv-03497-WMN, 2013 WL 990396 (D.Md. Mar. 12, 2013; Apr. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Raheem Rahman appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rahman v. Stouffer, No. 1:11-cv-03497-WMN, 2013 WL 990396 (D.Md. Mar. 12, 2013; Apr. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rahman v. Stouffer, 538 F. App'x 284 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

538 F. App'x 284 (Rahman v. Stouffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related