Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 31, 2025
Docket1:17-cv-05156
StatusUnknown

This text of Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc. (Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X MAHFUJUR RAHMAN AND LITON SHAH,

Plaintiff, 17 CIVIL 5156 (RA)

-against- JUDGMENT

RED CHILI INDIAN CAFE, INC., MOHAMMED MOJNU MIAH A/K/A SHEIKH MOHAMMED MOJNU, AND NOOR ISLAM A/K/A MOHAMMED HARUN MIAH,

Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 31, 2025, Plaintiff Rahman is awarded $38,880 and pre- judgment interest in the amount of $4.65 per day from April 7, 2016, until the date judgment is entered, amounting to $15,252 ($4.65 x 3,280 days). Plaintiff Shah is awarded $66,472.50, plus pre-judgment interest in the amount of $8.19 per day from October 30, 2015 until the date judgment is entered, amounting to $28,173.60 ($8.19 x 3,440 days). Plaintiffs are also awarded reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,895. In total, Plaintiffs are awarded against Defendants, jointly and severally, $126,247.50 in damages and fees, plus $43,425.60 in pre- judgment interest, amounting to $169,673.10. The Court has also vacated its entry of default as to Plaintiffs’ claims for statutory damages under the WTPA. Finally, the parties’ failure to file any written objections within the allotted period, in light of Judge Moses’s warning that such failure to do so would preclude appellate review, “operates as a waiver” and precludes appellate review of this decision. Kashelkar v. Vill. of Spring Valley, 320 F. App’x 53, 54 (2d Cir. 2009) (summary order) (citing DeLeon v. Strack, 234 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir. 2000)); see also ECF No. 166, at 26. Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG ClerkofCourt BY: K MANGE ‘Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rahman v. Red Chili Indian Cafe, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahman-v-red-chili-indian-cafe-inc-nysd-2025.