Rahman v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rahman v. New York City Transit Authority

88 A.D.2d 657, 450 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16887

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 657 (Rahman v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rahman v. New York City Transit Authority, 88 A.D.2d 657, 450 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent which, after a departmental hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and suspended him for a period of three days, petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated June 26,1981, as, upon transferring the matter to this court to determine whether the suspension was supported by substantial evidence, held that petitioner was not entitled to have a stenographic record made of the proceedings which resulted in his suspension. Judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, and proceeding dismissed, on the law, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent which, after a departmental hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and suspended him for a period of three days, petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated June 26,1981, as, upon transferring the matter to this court to determine whether the suspension was supported by substantial evidence, held that petitioner was not entitled to have a stenographic record made of the proceedings which resulted in his suspension. Judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, and proceeding dismissed, on the law, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 657, 450 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahman-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1982.