Rahman v. Gonzales
This text of 121 F. App'x 282 (Rahman v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[283]*283MEMORANDUM
The Board of Immigration Appeals’s conclusion that petitioners did not show persecution on account of any protected ground was supported by substantial evidence. See Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487, 1490-91 (9th Cir.1997).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 F. App'x 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahman-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.