Rahman v. Gonzales
121 F. App'x 282
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 17, 2005·No. No. 03-71258; Agency Nos. A73-964-990, A73-964-991, A73-964-992·Published
Opinion
[283]*283MEMORANDUM
The Board of Immigration Appeals’s conclusion that petitioners did not show persecution on account of any protected ground was supported by substantial evidence. See Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487, 1490-91 (9th Cir.1997).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rahman v. Gonzales, 121 F. App'x 282 (9th Cir. 2005).
121 F. App'x 282 (Rahman v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baljinder Singh SANGHA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
103 F.3d 1482 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)