Rahman v. City of New York

4 A.D.3d 142, 771 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226

This text of 4 A.D.3d 142 (Rahman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rahman v. City of New York, 4 A.D.3d 142, 771 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[143]*143Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J.), entered February 26, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the municipality, through promises or actions, had assumed an affirmative duty to act on his behalf; that the municipality or its agents knew that inaction could lead to harm; that there was some form of direct contact between him and the municipality’s agents; and that he had relied on the municipality’s affirmative undertaking (Cuffy v City of New York, 69 NY2d 255, 260 [1987]). Concur—Nardelli, J.E, Saxe, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuffy v. City of New York
505 N.E.2d 937 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.D.3d 142, 771 N.Y.S.2d 350, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2004.