Rahmaan v. Medical University of South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Rahmaan v. Medical University of South Carolina

478 F. App'x 26

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2012·No. No. 12-1789·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Master Wahoo Rahmaan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rahmaan v. Medical Univ. of South Carolina, No. 2:11-cv-03314-CWH (D.S.C. June 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Master Wahoo Rahmaan appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rahmaan v. Medical Univ. of South Carolina, No. 2:11-cv-03314-CWH (D.S.C. June 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rahmaan v. Medical University of South Carolina, 478 F. App'x 26 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 26 (Rahmaan v. Medical University of South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.