Rahab v. Verna

270 A.D.2d 472, 705 N.Y.S.2d 284, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated December 2, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $178,600.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

[473]*473Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the jury’s verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133).

The award of damages is not excessive since it does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). S. Miller, J. P., Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rahab v. Verna, 270 A.D.2d 472, 705 N.Y.S.2d 284, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 472 (Rahab v. Verna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jin Sil Kim v. City of New York
44 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)