Rahab v. Verna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rahab v. Verna

270 A.D.2d 472, 705 N.Y.S.2d 284, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D.2d 472 (Rahab v. Verna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rahab v. Verna, 270 A.D.2d 472, 705 N.Y.S.2d 284, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated December 2, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $178,600.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

[473]*473Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the jury’s verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133).

The award of damages is not excessive since it does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). S. Miller, J. P., Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated December 2, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $178,600.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

[473]*473Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the jury’s verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133).

The award of damages is not excessive since it does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). S. Miller, J. P., Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 472, 705 N.Y.S.2d 284, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rahab-v-verna-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack