Ragsdale v. Turner
156 S.E. 671, 171 Ga. 840, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 477
This text of 156 S.E. 671 (Ragsdale v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ragsdale v. Turner, 156 S.E. 671, 171 Ga. 840, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 477 (Ga. 1931).
Opinion
1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, which is conflicting, the jury was authorized to And a verdict for the defendant, as they did; and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.
2. None of the special assignments of error in the amendment to the motion for new trial are urged in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.
3. The trial judge did not err in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 671, 171 Ga. 840, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragsdale-v-turner-ga-1931.