Ragsdale v. State

112 S.E. 156, 28 Ga. App. 555, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 683
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1922
Docket13388
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 156 (Ragsdale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ragsdale v. State, 112 S.E. 156, 28 Ga. App. 555, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 683 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Ragsdale was convicted' of voluntary manslaughter. He made a motion for a new trial upon the usual general grounds and upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. The evidence authorized the conviction. As to the ground of newly discovered evidence a counter-showing was made by the State. Upon a careful examination of the record this court cannot say that it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial. The newly discovered evidence was not, in our opinion, such as would likely produce a different result upon another trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 156, 28 Ga. App. 555, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragsdale-v-state-gactapp-1922.