Ragsdale v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Ragsdale v. State

140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 438

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 So. 194 (Ragsdale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragsdale v. State, 140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 438 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and ad *439 judged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and ad *439 judged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragsdale-v-state-fla-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack