Ragsdale v. State

140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 438
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 11, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and ad *439 judged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ragsdale v. State, 140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 438 (Fla. 1932).

140 So. 194 (Ragsdale v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teplitz v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 45 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)