Ragsdale v. LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
703 S.E.2d 450, 364 N.C. 603
Opinion
Paul RAGSDALE, employee
v.
LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, employer and
CNA Claims Plus, carrier.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Daniel L. McCullough, Charlotte, for Lamar Outdoor Advertising, et al.
*451 Robert H. Gage, Morganton, for Paul Ragsdale.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of July 2010 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of November 2010."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ragsdale v. LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, 703 S.E.2d 450, 364 N.C. 603 (N.C. 2010).
703 S.E.2d 450 (Ragsdale v. LAMAR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.