Ragsdale v. Davis

1915 OK 423, 149 P. 1144, 48 Okla. 94, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 589
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 8, 1915·No. 4542·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on November 9, 1912; neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ragsdale v. Davis, 1915 OK 423, 149 P. 1144, 48 Okla. 94, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 589 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 423 (Ragsdale v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicholson v. Barnes
1914 OK 233 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)