Ragsdale v. Balte
This text of 2 Va. 201 (Ragsdale v. Balte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action of debt instituted in the District Court of Brunswick, by the defendant in error, against the plaintiff for 32/. 4s. 2d. with interest thereon from die 16th of June, 1770, also one penny, and 460 pounds of gross tobacco. The action was founded upon a judgment of the General Court rendered In the year 1784, in favour of the testator of the defendant, against the plaintiff, for 64/. 8s. 4d. for debt, also one penny for damages, and 460 pounds of gross tobacco for his costs, but to be discharged by the payment of the above-mentioned sum of 32/. 4s. 2d. with interest thereon from the 16th of June, 1770, together with the damages and costs above mentioned. Upon the plea of payment, a verdict was found for the defendant in error, in the year 1794 5 whereupon judgment was entered, 44 that he recover the said sum of 32/. 4s. 2d. with interest from the 16th of June, 1770,” as also the damages and costs aforesaid.
The plaintiff applied for, and obtained a supersedeas to the above judgment, from one of the Judges of this Court, assigning as error therein, 44 that by the defendant’s own shewing in his declaration; it is manifest, that he ought to have brought his suit for 64/. 8s. Ad. instead of 32/. 4s. 2d. with interest from 1770, whereby the interest recovered exceeded the sum for which the judgment, on which this suit was instituted, had been rendered.”
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Va. 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragsdale-v-balte-vactapp-1796.