Ragon Investments Corp., for Itself and on Behalf of Purchasers and Prospective Purchasers of Lots Within What is Known as the Forest North Subdivision v. the Texas Department of Transportation, Etal.
This text of Ragon Investments Corp., for Itself and on Behalf of Purchasers and Prospective Purchasers of Lots Within What is Known as the Forest North Subdivision v. the Texas Department of Transportation, Etal. (Ragon Investments Corp., for Itself and on Behalf of Purchasers and Prospective Purchasers of Lots Within What is Known as the Forest North Subdivision v. the Texas Department of Transportation, Etal.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-01-651-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
____________________________________________________________________
RAGON INVESTMENTS CORP., FOR ITSELF AND ON BEHALF OF PURCHASERS AND
PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF LOTS WITHIN WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE
FOREST NORTH SUBDIVISION , Appellant,
v.
THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL. , Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 107th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinjosa and Yañez
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, RAGON INVESTMENTS CORP., FOR ITSELF AND ON BEHALF OF PURCHASERS AND
PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF LOTS WITHIN WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE FOREST NORTH SUBDIVISION ,
perfected an appeal from an order entered by the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number
2001-08-3466-A . After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 1st day of November, 2001 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ragon Investments Corp., for Itself and on Behalf of Purchasers and Prospective Purchasers of Lots Within What is Known as the Forest North Subdivision v. the Texas Department of Transportation, Etal., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragon-investments-corp-for-itself-and-on-behalf-of-purchasers-and-texapp-2001.