Raglin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

1 2

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 7 CECELIA M. RAGLIN, Civil No. 3:19-CV-05504-MAT 8 Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ORDER 11 Defendant. 12 The judgment in the above-captioned case has been vacated. It is hereby ORDERED that 13 the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social 14 Security for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in 15 Carr v. Saul, 141 S. Ct. 1352 (2021). Upon remand from the court, Plaintiff will be given the 16 opportunity for a new hearing before a properly appointed administrative law judge who has not 17 already adjudicated this matter. 18 Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. Upon proper presentation, the Court will consider 19 whether reasonable attorney fees, costs, and expenses should be awarded pursuant to the Equal 20 Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1920. 21 DATED this 30th day of June, 2021. A 22 23 MARY ALICE THEILER 24 United States Magistrate Judge