Ragland's Executors v. Allin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Ragland's Executors v. Allin

8 Ky. 592, 1 A.K. Marsh. 592, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 102

DecidedJune 12, 1819

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. 592 (Ragland's Executors v. Allin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragland's Executors v. Allin, 8 Ky. 592, 1 A.K. Marsh. 592, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 102 (Ky. Ct. App. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Rowan

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action on the case to recover from defend* ants $300, obtained by them fraudulently from plaintiff in exchange for thirty counterfeit eagles. It abated by plaintiff’s death, was revived by scire facias, and prosecuted in the name of the executor. Verdict and judgment for $100 — motion for, a new trial made and overruled — exceptions taken and appeal. The error insisted upon at bar was, that the court refused when they should have.granted a new trial. There were two pleas put in by the defendants and joined by plaintiff: 1st. Not guilty: 2d. Not guilty within five years. The testimony conduced strongly and we think satisfactorily, to prove the fraud, and entitled the plaintiff to a recovery upon the first plea. Upon the second plea there was a diversity of evidence. The weight evidence was, that the fraud had been committed more than five years before the Impetration of the writ, but there was testimony proving it to have been practised within five years, and the jury, as we have often decided, arc, in such cases, the proper judges. The other errors assigned, relate to matters in abatement, and were waived by the, pleas.

Judgment affirmed with costs and damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Rowan

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action on the case to recover from defend* ants $300, obtained by them fraudulently from plaintiff in exchange for thirty counterfeit eagles. It abated by plaintiff’s death, was revived by scire facias, and prosecuted in the name of the executor. Verdict and judgment for $100 — motion for, a new trial made and overruled — exceptions taken and appeal. The error insisted upon at bar was, that the court refused when they should have.granted a new trial. There were two pleas put in by the defendants and joined by plaintiff: 1st. Not guilty: 2d. Not guilty within five years. The testimony conduced strongly and we think satisfactorily, to prove the fraud, and entitled the plaintiff to a recovery upon the first plea. Upon the second plea there was a diversity of evidence. The weight evidence was, that the fraud had been committed more than five years before the Impetration of the writ, but there was testimony proving it to have been practised within five years, and the jury, as we have often decided, arc, in such cases, the proper judges. The other errors assigned, relate to matters in abatement, and were waived by the, pleas.

Judgment affirmed with costs and damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ky. 592, 1 A.K. Marsh. 592, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raglands-executors-v-allin-kyctapp-1819.