Ragland v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ragland v. Sullivan

24 A.D.3d 781, 805 N.Y.S.2d 851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.3d 781 (Ragland v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragland v. Sullivan, 24 A.D.3d 781, 805 N.Y.S.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondents to accept certain motions for filing, and for poor person relief.

Ordered that the branch of the petition which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

[782]*782This proceeding has been rendered academic as the motions in question have been accepted for filing by the Rockland County Clerk, and have been assigned to a justice for determination. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondents to accept certain motions for filing, and for poor person relief.

Ordered that the branch of the petition which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

[782]*782This proceeding has been rendered academic as the motions in question have been accepted for filing by the Rockland County Clerk, and have been assigned to a justice for determination. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.3d 781, 805 N.Y.S.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragland-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-2005.