Ragland v. Kelly
This text of 304 A.D.2d 583 (Ragland v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent William Kelly, a Justice of the County Court, Rockland County, from commencing a trial under Rockland County Indictment No. 2002-132 in the action entitled People v Ragland, pending in that court, and an application for poor person relief.
Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]).
The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 A.D.2d 583, 756 N.Y.S.2d 908, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragland-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2003.