Ragland (Brandon) v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRANDON CHRISTOPHER RAGLAND, No. 69589 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

FILED MAR 0 4 2016 TRACE K LINDEMAN CLERK_W SUPREME COURT

\hwt trif1/4-151

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to expose malfeasance. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned decision, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1

it

Hardesty

tfretAi\

Saitta Pickering

'In light of this order, we deny as moot the pro se motion for leave to file an opening brief filed on February 9, 2016.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A en4

1(9-0-7040

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Brandon Christopher Ragland Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I94Th