Rager v. Cardiff

91 N.E.2d 665, 325 Mass. 764
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 31, 1950·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed. This is an appeal from an order of the Probate Court in the matter of the alleged will of Louise Saylor Freeman, late of Newton — made upon the motion of certain next of kin of the deceased —• framing an issue for submission to a jury as to fraud and undue influence of Lee Saylor Rager. Upon consideration of the statements of expected evidence — which need not be recited — in the light of the established principles of law governing the framing of issues and review on appeal after action of the Probate Court on motion for the framing of such issues — which have been frequently stated and need not be restated — including recognition of the element of discretion vested in the probate judge, we conclude that there was no error in the framing of the issue. Cook v. Mosher, 243 Mass. 149, 152-153. Hannon v. Gorman, 296 Mass. 437.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rager v. Cardiff, 91 N.E.2d 665, 325 Mass. 764 (Mass. 1950).

91 N.E.2d 665 (Rager v. Cardiff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Mosher
243 Mass. 149 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Hannon v. Gorman
6 N.E.2d 433 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)