Ragasa v. Simmons
This text of Ragasa v. Simmons (Ragasa v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000657 12-JUN-2013 09:18 AM
SCPW-13-0000657
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
BERNARDINO RAGASA, JR., Petitioner,
vs.
NETTIE SIMMONS, OFFENDER MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Cr. No. 07-1-1535)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Bernardino Ragasa,
Jr.’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on May 3,
2013, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support
thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to
demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to 497
days of presentence credit or that respondent miscalculated his
presentence credit. Moreover, petitioner previously sought
similar relief in the circuit court by way of a HRPP Rule 40
petition (S.P.P. No. 10-1-0076), the circuit court denied the HRPP Rule 40 petition, and petitioner did not appeal from the
circuit court’s decision. Petitioner is not entitled to mandamus
relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334,
338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that
will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and
indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to
redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
action); HRS § 706-671 (1993) (a defendant is entitled to credit
for time served in presentence incarceration in connection with
the same offense; a defendant is not entitled to presentence
credit for time served in connection with an unrelated criminal
offense). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 12, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ragasa v. Simmons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragasa-v-simmons-haw-2013.