Ragan v. Oliver

District Court, N.D. Texas·Decided January 16, 2024·No. 5:22-cv-00316·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION GARY GENE RAGAN, Plaintiff, V. No. 5:22-CV-316-H-BQ THOMAS P. OLIVER, et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) due to the plaintiffs failure to prosecute and comply with Court Orders. Dkt. No. 19. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. See Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiffs claims against the defendants are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to comply with Court Orders. So ordered on January 66, 2024. (oo iRrayartes UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ragan v. Oliver, (N.D. Tex. 2024).

Ragan v. Oliver (Ragan v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gerardo Serrano v. U.S. Customs and Border
975 F.3d 488 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)