Ragan v. McCoy

Supreme Court of Missouri

Ragan v. McCoy

26 Mo. 166

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJanuary 15, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 Mo. 166 (Ragan v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ragan v. McCoy, 26 Mo. 166 (Mo. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was begun under the act of 1849 and was tried by the court without a jury. The record does not contain (lie finding of the facts by the court, and for that reason, according to the settled practice of this court since the case of Bales and Bower, 17 Mo. 550, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. (20 Mo. 132, 133.)

The finding is a part of the record proper, and it is not [167]*167necessary to preserve it in a bill of exceptions. This rule does not apply to actions begun under the act of 1855.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was begun under the act of 1849 and was tried by the court without a jury. The record does not contain (lie finding of the facts by the court, and for that reason, according to the settled practice of this court since the case of Bales and Bower, 17 Mo. 550, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. (20 Mo. 132, 133.)

The finding is a part of the record proper, and it is not [167]*167necessary to preserve it in a bill of exceptions. This rule does not apply to actions begun under the act of 1855.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Mo. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ragan-v-mccoy-mo-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack